New Thread
4096 characters remaining
Max filesize: 3.00 MB, Max files: 3

/b/ - बकlol

बोलो जुबाँ केसरी
anon14/05/2019 (Tue) 00:35:239867Reply
Are cumbrains the real reason for the rise of sexual degeneracy?
>Demand porn to be legalized
>Demand sodomy to be legalized
>Demand adultery to be legalized
>Years later...
>Any kind of sex is now okay as long as it is """consent"""ing
Incest already in the normalisation stage, only responsible angry dads of the previous generation start the beginning of the acceptance of pedophila. Once all of them die out, we can start on that too.
>The institution of marriage gets deroded and eventually irrelevant
No more is it needed that two people need to have a committed relationship to start a family. Institutions of marriage and family gets deroded. People only seek sex for the pleasure value and short term open relationships and one night stands on the rise. Polyamory becomes the norm and fertility rate drops and governments rely on imported immigrants to realistically sustain the nation.
>Polygamy and Hypergamy on the rise, incel epidemic in the rise too
Women no longer need to sleep with a greesy looking fat boi in exchange for care and support. All she seek now in it is her own pleasure and naturally she only wants to sleep with makes with HMV.
Polacks are quick to blame women's rights and feminism for the rise sexual degeneracy. But no matter how I look into it, is men themselves to be blamed for this.
34 posts and 10 images omitted.
anon14/05/2019 (Tue) 16:50:509941Reply
>wealth does
Libertarianism is a natural result of wealth prosperity which then starts decadence. And no I didn't mean the modern definition of libertarianism existed in past times. I meant that the as wealth prosperity decreased the restrictions placed on civil behaviour which then led to social decay.
>Islamic society during the high medieval ages could hardly be called libertarian
False. It was more 'liberal' relative to any other society during its time. The idea that Islamic world was permanently a barbaric illiberal dystopia is quite a conservative dogma. The key term here is 'relative'.
>in fact a mark of decadence in India at least was the constant choking of individual ambitions
That by itself is a consequence of it
Wealth prosperity leads to more rights for those with wealth. That leads to decadence which also include taking away rights from those without wealth. And finally social collapse.
>When the Aryas first started expanding in India, every man was king
Where are you getting these wild claims from? Source on this? Me thinks you are rather confusing the proto anarchism in barbaric hordes to be something a sort of prosperity and liberalism when the truly prosperous Indus Valley Civilization already collapsed. This is merely the next stage of a collapsed society, where anarchic mobs take over and try to establish their own order. This is characteristic of all societies, even with the Mongolian and Turkic barbarians that ravaged India and the of Eurasia as well after most of their societies collapsed.
>free market proponents are the reason for global prosperity
Another lolbertarian myth. If you have noticed, prosperity ain't linear, it's a bell curve. You can observe a microcosm of it in our major metro cities. There will be an initial rise in wealth and prosperity but eventually after reaching a peak, it's then a slow decadence as income inequalities and ethnic tensions rise, people live as bonded laborers and coolies for corporations, most live in cranky one room apartments, ecological pollution and health hazards rise and 80-20 rule pervades in all spheres of life. Meanwhile those who live in rural regions and small towns live more fulfilling lives. The most richest states in the world has some of the most highest suicide rates in the world. Don't you think it's contradictory that you agree that wealth leads to decadence but disagree when I say the free market lolbertarian point that wealth creation for the sake of wealth creation is bad? The only country that escaped this cyclical prices was perhaps America due to the leadership of Woodrow Wilson who recognised that dogma of personal liberty is not something to be held up as the supreme truth and found strenght in collectivism and authoritarianism during the depression ages when America was during its collapse period. And as a result it came out even more prosperous and right then any other country before it. Indeed no wonder why many lolbertarians hated him.
Anyways what I was talking about of the global warming and the resultant mass extinction that's going to happen that is a direct consequence of free market lolbertarianism. No use in global prosperity when there won't be a globe to live. However that point completely flew over your head.
>hurr durr they used to be degenerate so let's be degenerate too
Not an argument. Rome too engaged in
>but the only one normoids know of is prudish Abramic ones

Message too long. Click here to view full text.

anon14/05/2019 (Tue) 17:07:279942Reply
It's the same story in India to Greece. Here materialist hedonism and exploitation with wealth was rejected for learning and some sort of a proto humanism. Also Kamasutra and in the case of Rig Veda it wasn't about pursuing degenerate sexual fantasies. As I said mild form of asceticism calls for everything in moderation. So don't conflate that with the pedastry and incest of the Roman periods, you are presenting again a false dichotomy.
It's generally agreed acceptance of pedastry and sexual degeneracy was during the decadence period, not during Rome's golden age .
>You can see society changing as a result of changes in individual aspirations
No. Society is organic as a whole. Your mind seem to be unable to understand the ideology of organism and seem to be interpreting things based on extremes. Individuals themselves are a part of it but it's the utilitarian collective prosperity of the whole that is to be prioritized. And this utilitarian collective prosperity requires acceptance of certain values by societies as a whole.
You are confusing this utilitarian collective prosperity to be the absolute maximum prosperity of an individual. Which is not really the case.
anon14/05/2019 (Tue) 17:17:189943Reply
Oh and yes forgot to add that prosperity of the first world nations have been in decadence for quite a time now. It's now the third and second world who are getting prosperous after recently abandoning their socialistic policies and adopting free markets and in the ascendancy period of the bell curve. But make no mistake, we too will face their same fates.
anon14/05/2019 (Tue) 19:05:399949Reply
Wealthier societies usually acquire more checks on social conduct. That's what would seem apparent from looking at the modern world anyway. Certain sexual taboos have been done away with but pedophilia for one is pretty taboo when previously it was common . In a way you could argue that an average urban Westerner is expected to think, act and talk in a certain manner without which he would be ostracized by their society. Comparatively for us the rules are far more relaxed, we can easily be Islamophobic or w/e but if we start being casteist openly then we too would get btfo by our society. Poorfags don't have to give a single fuck, they can start riots with FB posts. The 'every man for himself' ideology definitely isn't very popular in the modern Golden Age, it seems decadents mostly stick to collectivism. There are more Gommies and Fascists in the decadent West than libertarians, who btw were the majority back when places like the US were being built up. '
>Falling for the akshually Muzzies were progressives before ebil mongols meme

Lmao. Yes, they had mellowed out from the 7th century but they still weren't liberal in any manner. Their fundamental social structure remained. A polygamous aristocratic large slave worked plantation owning population isn't liberal. Also, the thing you linked just talks about how Islam was more progressive than pre Islamic Arabia.

>include taking away rights from those without wealth.

But this isn't what happened, anon. What happened was a bunch of generalissimos got to call themselves kings and play war over the corpse of the Empire every year. This, along with other international changes, killed internal trade and commerce and wrecked the Vaishyas. That's what killed us, the destruction of our productive, entrepreneurial class and the shameful delight with which the two ruling classes pounced to ensure it never built itself up again. Free trade India(Gupta) was literally best India.

You're talking about urban planning problems, not innate problems with the free market model. The free market does have ups and downs, yes, but even after a nation has stopped growing and even with nations that fall into the middle income trap life is much better than it was prior to free markets. We could go into a 2% recession for 15 years now and we'd still be better off than we were before 90.

Also, those cities still support millions who'd be otherwise jobless, and millions more stream in every year knowing what the cities are like already so despite the decline in QoL they're obviously worth it. And no, living in the countryside isn't comfier. I have relatives who live in the countryside, they are even somewhat better off than their neighbours but they are still depressingly poor. Genuinely, every time I go there, it's like this black haze falls over me, the kind of gloomy vibe you get from reading Poe.

The suicide rate thing probably just has to do with the nature of work that people in richer states do. White collar workers generally take much more mental stress than labourers, some professions(lawyers for one) are much more likely to seppuku than others. They simply have more white collar workers than us. If you compared Indians with an income above 12lpa with Americans I don't think there'd be much of a difference in suicide rates. Poors don't suicide because they are too stupid to think.

>Muh global warming extinction

Message too long. Click here to view full text.

anon14/05/2019 (Tue) 19:21:229952Reply
> The actual society that led to that prosperity was prudish celebrating virtues such as celibac

I literally gave you an example from the Rig Veda showing why that's untrue. Early Vedic society had official hymns for praying you could slip into your hole's room without waking up their dog. The Rape of the Sabines seems pretty degenerate and happened when Rome was at her most vigorous.

Romans only accepted pederasty when they were influenced by Greece so later, yes, but Greece had pederasty down to an art even before the days of Pericles.
Also, in both Greece and India, materialist hedonism lost to asceticism in the period of decline. After the brilliance of the Janapada period, Buddhism brought us 600 years of civil strife, lack of stability and foreign domination. The explosion of Stoicism after Alexander similarly dulled the ambition that had made Greeks master of 75% of the known world.

People can't be prosecuted for going against procedures they can't rationally follow. It's a difficult issue but ultimately if a society has grown unhealthy you can't cure it simply by banning certain symptoms, in fact attempting to do so will likely trigger a strong backlash(Think free love movement 30 years after American puritans were at their strongest, banning alcohol). Ultimately you have to recognize none of us is driving the car and if society is trending towards disintegration there's nothing anyone can do to stop it, it's inevitable.
how should i show a bhangi his place?anon13/05/2019 (Mon) 17:00:079841Reply
my watchman to ask for rent shouted oiiii when i was like 5 feet away from me.

he should have addressed me as sir or just my name.

i pretended to not hear him even when i clearly could hear him.

but i want to show him his place once for all.
21 posts and 2 images omitted.
anon14/05/2019 (Tue) 07:08:579902Reply
Not an argument
anon14/05/2019 (Tue) 07:50:039903Reply
TBF I'm just thankful I wasn't born a Shudra, genuinely wouldn't have minded being born a Kayastha or something either.

But to be born a Shudra though. Your entire life is just coping.
anon14/05/2019 (Tue) 11:58:419922Reply
Based and Chamaarpilled
anon14/05/2019 (Tue) 12:10:149924Reply
>makes bhangi tier thread
>responds 'no u' like a bhangi
how are you not a bhangi
anon14/05/2019 (Tue) 12:30:149925Reply
This so much.
Op confirmed bhangi larping as savarna just to fit in.
anon11/05/2019 (Sat) 09:39:499667Reply
Anyone under 175cm confirmed manlet.
3 posts omitted.
anon14/05/2019 (Tue) 02:21:169877Reply
I did
anon14/05/2019 (Tue) 03:28:449881Reply
What did you do to him?
anon14/05/2019 (Tue) 05:09:589890Reply
Sucked him till he was limp
anon14/05/2019 (Tue) 06:10:599898Reply
anon14/05/2019 (Tue) 09:15:539907Reply
/b/hratas how do your survive here?anon08/05/2019 (Wed) 08:41:069355Reply
Living in India is fucking horrible if you aren't socially skilled. I know every country can't be Nippon tier based about such things but honestly in India every person I meet seems to be at least a failed normoid, whenever I try to explain why I don't feel the need to invite the bhangis I have to call my classmates over to my home my parent's eyes just kind of glaze over as if they've never seen someone who doesn't like social interactions before. Funnily enough, my mother is actually quiet introverted and usually just keeps a smile frozen on her face and laughs at other's jokes at family functions and such. My dad is a typical extrovert and chatters away endlessly, even if it is about boring stuff, but my mom doesn't unless only our closest relatives are present. I just don't get why she pretends to enjoy those gatherings, seeing as how she's obviously so uncomfortable during them. In any case, from what I remember of the times I was forced to sit in front of others and listen to their inane gossip, it's mostly really boring stories about their lives, I don't know why even smart extroverts seem to cherish such pointless conversation so much.

I've seen that even extremely introverted people tend to hang out with 'friends' here, they are usually the guy walking alone at the back when the group is walking in double or triple file, the guy who gets covered up or left out in group selfies and they usually don't speak on their own at all. I'd say 15% of the groups I observed had such a member and it was honestly sad watching them cause I could empathize somewhat with them and wondered why they took on the torture of socializing just to avoid the tag of being asocial.
62 posts and 8 images omitted.
ObjectivelyBetterThanYou #eMOrcO13/05/2019 (Mon) 16:16:439838Reply
+5 to me for a good try, I guess.
anon13/05/2019 (Mon) 16:39:279840Reply
Are u essay anon aka Sikant?
ObjectivelyBetterThanYou #eMOrcO14/05/2019 (Tue) 00:57:159873Reply
Indiachan (currect version) is the only Indian community I've ever commented at.
anon14/05/2019 (Tue) 01:05:089874Reply
Are you a virgin?
ObjectivelyBetterThanYou #eMOrcO14/05/2019 (Tue) 05:14:079892Reply
anon10/05/2019 (Fri) 13:06:009540Reply
>Be me
>College announces we have to do this mandatory social service thing where we have to teach some chamars
>Forgot all about it so the faggot who is supposed to narc on us if we don't go wakes me up
>It's 5:30
>Brush teeth and run, had been awake till 4AM previous night so still really sleepy
>It's cold
>Finally get there with the other bhangis who are supposed to teach with me
>There's 5 of us and 15 students
>No chairs, we are supposed to teach squatting on the floor
>Everyone snaps up as many students as they can while I hang back hoping I don't have to take any, turns out it was my lucky day so I just sit by myself a bit farther away and try to pass time
>15 minutes in
>Everyone is mostly advancing all right but this one bhangi is getting absolutely ignored by the one student he got, he literally hasn't looked at him once since he began teaching(TBF he has an ugly mug).
>Really hate that bhangi so I like the kid for instinctively hating him too
>Walk over to them and squat beside the kid, take the book from my fellow bhangi without uttering a word.
>He was teaching Maths, I wondered what kind of a moron teaches class 3 level Maths without an exercise book and decided I didn't want to know
>Put the book away and ask the kid what his favourite subject is

Message too long. Click here to view full text.

15 posts and 1 image omitted.
anon12/05/2019 (Sun) 01:42:559731Reply
Oh god everyone of you is absolutely insufferable. You people are incapable of adding anything of value to a topic.
anon12/05/2019 (Sun) 01:52:309732Reply
You're so angry that one could say
anon12/05/2019 (Sun) 08:23:189760Reply
Be the bro he never had
anon13/05/2019 (Mon) 17:50:089845Reply
no way he remembers you . Just forget about it op and fap to futanari hentai like the rest of the degenerates here.
anon13/05/2019 (Mon) 19:57:529861Reply
Diu le lou mou
How to get a gf in India threadanon08/05/2019 (Wed) 18:34:509392Reply
tell me pls i don't want to be an incel forever
10 posts omitted.
anon08/05/2019 (Wed) 23:17:269453Reply
Become a wagie and hope you'll get married off by age 27. Don't bother dating Indian femoids. They are feels highly entitled, high maintainence and high on bitchiness factor. Or maybe escort after collecting some amount.
anon13/05/2019 (Mon) 17:57:359848Reply
if you're desperate then join a bengali feminist group in Facebook and get one libtard bong gf.
anon13/05/2019 (Mon) 18:18:409851Reply
Outside of major towns the idea of Western style dating is generally looked down in India. You are expected to have a serious relationship that'll end in marriage and having the qualities of a family man (MMV for each girl, my friends who had lovers were dumped for reasons varying from not being high enough to not having enough monthly income) , not just fool around. Only then will you earn the right to sleep with the girl. That's why India have one of the highest age for losing virginity. People have to meet certain conditions before earning that right to sleep.
Of course it's slowly changing thanks to import of Western liberal values through anglo media and internet but even still you are expected to have a serious relationship. I know many cases were women charged rape cases against men on the basis that they promised marriage. Unlike in West, a guy who sleeps around with many women isn't glorified in the media, they are usually seen as a dick.
anon13/05/2019 (Mon) 18:25:269852Reply
What I'm saying is don't buy into this incel theory wholesale in here. It's really not that practical in a society like ours where monogamy is enforced. Of course now that adultery is made illegal and """women's rights""" are a popular woke topic to support, I'll give it 2 to 3 decades, maybe sooner before it'll be relevant here.
anon13/05/2019 (Mon) 18:48:149853Reply
I just want to impregnate a girl with no education, make her deliver a baby and then just abandon both. It's my secret fantasy to be a Gendo Ikari tier dick head.
anon04/05/2019 (Sat) 17:48:369118Reply
>Why yes, I do maintain a sattvic diet, is a yogi, a brahmachari and read a lot How did you know?
4 posts omitted.
anon04/05/2019 (Sat) 22:48:509151Reply
>Vain enough to unnecessarily build muscles for outer attractiveness
>Yogi, bharamachari
anon11/05/2019 (Sat) 11:00:099690Reply
Hitler was a Sattvic, killed more fags, joos than even muslims can dream of
anon11/05/2019 (Sat) 11:08:199691Reply
Hitler was a fag. His initial plan was 'L-lets just reform them'. It was based and redpilled pic related who convinced him to first deport and then to genocide them.
anon11/05/2019 (Sat) 19:18:149726Reply
>Tie up valuable train carriages, fuel, concrete and other war materials desperately needed for a front that's slowly collapsing
>Don't even use the slave population efficiently, high attrition rate makes work erratic
>Ensure your nation, which you already know is losing the war, will forever be purged of your politics post war because of this.

Lol and all that for

>The j00s get the homeland they have been whining about since forever
>Your women have millions of Slav rape babies
>Poles annex part of muh fatherland
>Country gets split up and puppeted by Mutts and Slavs

anon13/05/2019 (Mon) 17:51:089846Reply
top kek
IT niggers can you make something like this?anon12/05/2019 (Sun) 08:58:249762Reply
I once doxxed a fag who road raged at me from just his number plate.

Gobarmint portals tell you in whose name a car is registered so I got his name from there. Unfortunately he was a Gupta so that didn't make things much easier but he was talking on the phone with his wife while the police were talking to me and I overheard him tell her he's just 15 min from home which, combined with the direction he was travelling, let me roughly approximate his address. So I went on the Election Commission's site and simply downloaded the voter rolls from the area. I could approx guess his age so I kept looking for 30-40 aged males named Gupta with a wife. I found 11 men in total who fit that criteria, so I began googling their relatives name along with their names to get hits from Facebook. It worked out and I quickly ruled out 4 guys till I finally came on my guy. Funny thing was he didn't even have a Facebook account but his fatass wife had mentioned him in a family picture so I got her account and her son's. I ended up not actually doing something because sending gore to his wife or son would just be a dick move and not the rightful vengeance I craved.

However, I realised what an asset Election Commission rolls are. You could download the entire country's rolls, properly index the data and create a tool that'd give you the addresses of all people with a certain name in a region. You could even include parameters like family members and age. Unless someone's named Mohammad Khan or something anyone could be traced, even in a metropolis given a few hours of trial and error.

Is it possible to build? One thing about the electoral rolls that might be an issue was they were scanned so ctrl+f didn't work. There's ways to search for words even in image files though(Google Books does it) so it shouldn't be too much of an issue.
29 posts and 1 image omitted.
anon12/05/2019 (Sun) 17:24:529807Reply
Post em
anon12/05/2019 (Sun) 17:42:229809Reply
Not going to use my teacher's pic cause I don't want to get doxxed and lungoot bans for porn posting in general so no. I just googled horse fucking woman and chose one where there was a front profile and shooped her face in poorly.

She did end up lecturing us about internet safety a few classes(How we shouldn't open emails from people we don't know) later though, it was painful not being able to tell people where that suddenly came from.
anon12/05/2019 (Sun) 18:37:079814Reply
anon13/05/2019 (Mon) 11:27:039829Reply
anon13/05/2019 (Mon) 17:44:589844Reply
fuck her wife atleast retard
Got hard watching the sacking scene in latest swordshit episodeanon13/05/2019 (Mon) 09:32:049828Reply
Anyone else?
anon13/05/2019 (Mon) 12:05:049830Reply
>Watching swordshit
It's 2019 Gramps. GOT is for ultra normies.
anon13/05/2019 (Mon) 12:35:499831Reply
The graphics makes it worth it.
anon13/05/2019 (Mon) 15:04:109832Reply
Lost interest after they killed littlefinger because they were too low iq to continue his character.
anon13/05/2019 (Mon) 15:05:199833Reply
Still watched the whole shitshow, wasn't not disappointed
anon13/05/2019 (Mon) 15:19:209834Reply
> Stand Up comedy

These are some cheap western cancer art meant for low IQ nerds.
YWN shoot arrows at Turkroaches from these wallsanon12/05/2019 (Sun) 09:47:429763Reply
Why live?
anon12/05/2019 (Sun) 10:38:169764Reply
I rather live now than to work for an incompetent army serving a solipsistic king and his nigger nobility and get over run by turkroaches who had far more ability in uniting and organising a large empire and army and then get to see my kin raped and BTFO by them.
anon12/05/2019 (Sun) 12:54:269792Reply
they never ran over they never could
that standing fort is the proof (because they usually destroy shit that they occupy)
anon12/05/2019 (Sun) 14:21:329795Reply
What the fuck?

Dude, it's a fact that Turks occupied Chittor under Khalji and then under Akbar, why the fuck would they destroy a fort that they would need to keep the region pacified? They also occupied several other strategic Rajput forts they never destroyed like Ranthambore, Kalinjar and the whole chain of forts that stood between the Gangetic Doab and Malwa/Rajputana. No one ever destroys forts, it's the temples they destroyed.
anon12/05/2019 (Sun) 14:51:409796Reply
Last stands are kino though, literally the best way to go.


(Removes the file reference to the posts)

(Removes the saved files from the server)