New Thread
4096 characters remaining
Max filesize: 3.00 MB, Max files: 3

/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Habbenings, news and serious stuff
anon20/05/2019 (Mon) 09:58:596952Reply
What are your thoughts on rajput's
1 post omitted.
anon20/05/2019 (Mon) 11:09:546957Reply
cucks who pretended to fight when actually sold their daughters to the muslims for matrimonial alliances.

the only hindus who truly fought were the Gurjara-Pratiharas (ancestors of Rajputs who defeated Arabs), and Marathas (defeated the Mughals)
anon20/05/2019 (Mon) 12:05:396963Reply
Not everyone
anon20/05/2019 (Mon) 13:12:386970Reply
Rajputs are slave to their ego.they never really unified against their enemies hence just good losers.
anon20/05/2019 (Mon) 14:12:586973Reply
>Gurjara Pratiharas

Wat? These were the retards who called off multiple invasions of Arab Sindh because they threatened to destroy the sun image of Debul. Muzzies weren't a factor during Pratiharas, they were mostly busy beating up Palas and then getting raped by Rashtrakutas. They were Rajputs, not 'ancestors of Rajputs' you retard, Rajputs had formed by the late Gupta age from the Saka Kshatrapas.

Marathas were also the staunch allies of Malik Kafur's army during Alauddin's Southern campaigns. First off, Alauddin only got to sit on the throne because the retarded Yadavas gave him so much gold he could bribe everyone around him. Then, the Yadavas served as the base for Khilji attacks on Dvarasamudra, Warangal and the Pandya realms.

You forgot among the true Hindus the Kabulshahis, who not only fought off the Turk hoards for centuries but even took the war into their country. The people of Zabulistan and Bolan Pass too, some stateless pastoralists in Bolan Pass routed seven armies sent by the Caliphate before the eighth got through and into Sindh. The Tripuris and the Kamtapuri/Assamese who repeatedly routed superior armies from the Bengal Sultanate.
anon20/05/2019 (Mon) 14:59:196974Reply
Just for the sake of clarification, the term 'rajput' isn't restricted to the various kshatriya clans of rajputana as many people mistakenly believe, in fact it is a term almost universally adopted by kshatriyas across the north (with the exception of khatris).

That being said, I don't think the issue with the rajput houses of the north-west was that they were bad fighters, the problem was that like the rest of the rest of the dindus they were too inward looking. The muzzie invaders could get beaten back 19 times out of 20 and just win once to break through and establish a permanent presence in our lands.

This is why the hill rajputs were more based, at least they tried to conquer foreign territories, and were even successful on some occasions.
anon20/05/2019 (Mon) 12:29:246966Reply
my youth I was a bit of a troll taunting Congress and other seculars by observing Godse Jayanthi and singing his praises wherever possible and publicly expressed a desire to name my future son Nathuram Godse :) All of this does not stem from an admiration of Godse or to justify his assasination of Gandhi. When that madwoman Pragya Thakur calls Godse a deshbhakt , she is not completely incorrect in that Godse considered himself a patriot and was quite upset by how Hindu and Sikh women were treated by Muslim mobs. Koenraad Elst notes that Hindu refugee women from Pakistan did not want to hear a negative word against him and many donated their jewels so that he may able to get a good attorney or something like that. These women had suffered horrible traumas and humiliations so it is understandable for them to have an extreme reaction against someone who they held accountable for their fate-Gandhi. Similarly I understand Godses angst but it was an ill calculated emotional reaction which helped deify Gandhi in modern India and made the Hindutva movement go underground and lose its intellectual base for which it is suffering to this day.Savarkars name got sullied in the process from which he has just recovered over the last 15 years or so mostly due to the efforts of online Hindutvadis.

Gandhis views were demoralizing to Hindus. I was ashamed when I was a teenager upon his observation that average Hindu was a coward and the average Muslim was a bully. Not knowing too much anecdotal evidence about that era in the interaction between Hindus and Muslims, let us assume that is true- it is quite plausible due to demartialization Hindus had lost their honor, integrity and courage. Look at what happens to Germans post WWII, the mighty Nazis who almost single handedly took U.S,U.K and the Soviet Union are now helpless before a third rate unarmed mob of Syrians marching into their country. This is what Churchil and Eisenhower(ironically himself of German parentage) wanted so that Germany does not make trouble again.
The Nairs who were considered the bravest soldiers in the world by Portuguese and Dutch observers and mananged to inflict the most casulaties on the British that they suffered in any subcontinental war could do nothing when some Muslim coolies like Moplahs gang raped their women 100 years later. This happend after British banned all kalaries and forbid them from carrying weapons.
Gandhis solution was to make Hindus even more cowardly while Savarkar wanted them to be more courageous and enroll in the army. Tilak had the same idea and implored the now downbeat Marathas to revive their martial heritage by taking up gymnastics.
Problem was as Aakar Patel pointed out, the culture of Gandhi was a Gujarati Baniya of Jain background who thought he could negotiate and bargain his way into indepedence. WHile Gandhi was not personally cowardly(a stretcher bearer in war is not a nervous person) he came from a milieu that did not honor courage and he projected that onto all other Hindus due to his British education which saw Hindus as simply victim of constant invasions from whom the British rescued.
All these twitter wars simply seem to obfuscate the reality which no one wants to talk about- which is that Hindus want to be seen and engage in violence and war. Gandhism is dead but it is being bandied about both Congress and BJP government because it is useful for controlling the masses as the state wants monopoly on violence. This is the same reason why Tamil Nadu banned the erecting of veerakals(hero stones) of those who died in some village combats due to either jallikattu or caste wars. A neutered, emasculated population is easy for the government to control but the masses are having enough of it. Thats a big part of Gandhi/Godse issue.
anon20/05/2019 (Mon) 12:30:026967Reply
Excerpt from Empire of light, author's comments
anon20/05/2019 (Mon) 12:49:496968Reply
Some say godse did not kill Gandhi. There was a third bullet that killed him
anon20/05/2019 (Mon) 12:50:526969Reply
Prominent politicians like swami?
anon20/05/2019 (Mon) 14:10:286972Reply
I said this before, I will say this again. Hinduism is not one religion, one caste, one culture and one race. By continuously interpreting Hinduism as such we are cucking ourselves with this syncretic, multicultural, tolerant, egalitarian baniya version of the faith. Hindu Aikya(Unity) should be the mantra, not Hindi Ekta(Uniformity).
anon20/05/2019 (Mon) 14:09:406971Reply

HE!1!!!!!!11!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1111111111!!11 KEK!! KEK!! KEK!!


HOOOOOOOOLLLLLLYYYYY SHIT i just fall of chair!!!! simply le epic so ebin dae le epin win xD pwn’d ftw le bacon narwhale xP upboated good sir i tip my fedora to you! tips fedora, le any1 athiest? LOL






Message too long. Click here to view full text.

anon20/05/2019 (Mon) 01:06:226943Reply
anon20/05/2019 (Mon) 11:10:566958Reply
seriously whats up with southies and incest? all maps of incest marriages i see southern states have higher %age despite haveing lower %age of muzzies
anon20/05/2019 (Mon) 11:12:186960Reply
It's the high IQ races that indulge in incest stfu
anon20/05/2019 (Mon) 11:18:016962Reply
>north african moor
>high IQ

anon20/05/2019 (Mon) 12:07:176964Reply
Once read an answer on quora where some Tamil guy posted about his sister who said no to marriage because of too much dowry. The groom was her bua ka ladka. Everyone was going wtf in the comments section and he was like "wut? They are brother and sister, they are cousins. What's wrong with that?".
I was thinking about the poetic justification because once upon a Time her father would have brought dowry home but her bua/his sister would've had to give it . Now she was taking it back.
Election 2019 Prediction Threadanon19/05/2019 (Sun) 12:59:446876Reply
Post your predictions braddas
20 posts and 2 images omitted.
anon19/05/2019 (Sun) 20:21:506919Reply
Nah they are 80 IQ cretins who pretend to be more intelligent than thou
anon19/05/2019 (Sun) 23:02:306933Reply
Now it would be extremely funny if the exit polls were wrong.
anon19/05/2019 (Sun) 23:35:516939Reply
>Atishi losing and Pragya Thakur winning.Congrats India!
>The people never fail to disappoint. From electing Indira after emergency to electing Modi after an undeclared emergency. What a shit country!
anon19/05/2019 (Sun) 23:46:226940Reply
Absolutely SEETHING. I don't like the dindu hindus but I hate Muslims so I like to see people like Pragya winning
anon20/05/2019 (Mon) 02:17:376944Reply
Also every leftie on Twitter is super mad at YoYa for saying "congress must die". They are also angry at rajdeep
anon19/05/2019 (Sun) 23:23:186937Reply
>In a letter to Hemantabala Sarkar, written on the 16th of October, 1933, quoted in Bengali weekly ‘Swastika’ on 21-6-1999, he says, “The terrible situation of the country makes my mind restless and I cannot keep silent. Meaningless ritual keeps the Hindus divided into hundred sects. So we are suffering from a series of defeats. We are tired and worn-out by the fortunes by the internal-external enemies. The Muslims are united in religion and rituals. The Bengali Muslims the South Indian Muslims and even the Muslims outside India-all are united. They always stand united in face of danger. The broken and divided Hindus will not be able to combat them. Days are coming when the Hindus will be again humiliated by the Muslims. “You are a mother of children, one day you will die, passing the future of Hindus society on the weak shoulders of your children, but think about their future.”
anon19/05/2019 (Sun) 23:26:486938Reply
Dindu hindoos of UP/Bihar are atleast doing something right I guess
anon14/05/2019 (Tue) 19:08:446679Reply
why not gas all meat eating beasts?

7 posts omitted.
anon19/05/2019 (Sun) 22:54:176931Reply
those are the jews that came here larping as refugees.
im not joking. look it up
anon19/05/2019 (Sun) 22:54:286932Reply
sigh larping as brahmins*
anon19/05/2019 (Sun) 23:05:246934Reply

I'm a Goan brahmin
anon19/05/2019 (Sun) 23:15:006935Reply
KYS Chamar
anon19/05/2019 (Sun) 23:16:586936Reply
Delet dis!! I-it's not true. P-parrikar is based!!!
anon19/05/2019 (Sun) 21:34:266923Reply
anyone else sad BJP is winning?

im not a leftist; im just an accelerationist.

now the bjp or other RW would be satisfied and wont try anything new.

i dont think they'd build the mandir or do anything about the muzzies
anon19/05/2019 (Sun) 21:46:256924Reply
Oh boy you are absolutely wrong here, the thing with BJP is they start preparing for next elections as soon as one ends. They never stop campaigning is what I see.
That gujju Amit Shah is one sob, and there's pressure from RSS to build the Mandir so I hope they will build it.
anon19/05/2019 (Sun) 21:53:186926Reply
I'm an accelerationist as well. I want everything to accelerate towards Hindu rashtra.
anon19/05/2019 (Sun) 22:07:386927Reply
I just want a government that will implement UCC, remove RTE, temples act, settle pandits in Kashmir, Hindu immigrants in Bangla, reduce the size and reach of the government & its spending and remove reservations slowly. Dalits and mullahs getting btfo during the process is just a bonus.
I don't want a government that'll pour stuff like aadhar, spying, gst, note ban, national anthem, etc... down my throat when I don't need it.
Why can't I just have nice things?
anon19/05/2019 (Sun) 22:40:586930Reply
I don't care about mandir, it's 100s of kms from me and it's not like a I'm really that much of a Ram Bhakt or a Bhaktifag of any kind. But I would agree if people of UP wants a mandir there, then they should do it.
The problem I have with BJP it is all hollow talk and gimmicks such as note ban. It's achievement in the economic front had been rather disappointing. And it has yet to do anything on the matters of UCC, RTE and Temples Act, which were the primary promises it made during 2014.
I want a real pro Hindu party that'll revive Hindu cultural symbols like Sanskrit, Hindu philosophy, old temples and our environment. Not spend money on pointless statues of old men in stupid poses and make your nigger followers to force me to accept it.
And I have problems with some of its views. Citizenship Act should be implemented only in West Bengal. Instead in Assam, it should deport the illegal muslim immigrants. Same case in Kashmir where it should settle Kashmiri Hindus and their relatives.
Asking for reservations to be slowly removed would be too much I guess.
Hindu Swarajanon18/05/2019 (Sat) 02:51:496792Reply
What would a Hindu Rashtra be like according to you? Also tell a realistic plan on how you can go there from the current path.
12 posts and 3 images omitted.
anon19/05/2019 (Sun) 06:08:126869Reply
Did you mean
anon19/05/2019 (Sun) 06:30:026871Reply
1) The presidential system will be abolished for a federal constitutional elective monarchy one party state like it was during Maratha Confederacy. This can be achieved by putting forth more and more restrictions on the parties that can contest in elections and eventually it'll be only parties that agree to a particular loose but broader ideology that can conduct in election. Any anti hindu, anti indian and anti federation party will be banned from elections. Constitutional elective monarchy can be achieved by increasing the president's term limits. The president and the coalition of Hindu parties will then check on each others powers.
2) As I said in the above post, the powers of the central government shall be severely limited and decentralised. It shall be limited to common civil law, military, intra & international relations, tax collection & distribution and currency printing.
3) Even the state will have limited powers and the state governments that follow anti hindu, anti indian and anti federation practices will be punished.
4) Sanskrit, Bharat Matha and Bhagwa Dwaj will replace the current national symbols of unity. Education in native languages will be revived. Other Hindu cultural symbols shall also be revived too(For eg- Declare Shivaji as the father of the state instead of Gandhi).
5) States shall be encouraged to help each other out to make up for their short comings.
anon19/05/2019 (Sun) 21:08:586920Reply
I don't care about Hindu rashtra but hate Muslims because they are uncivilised and project their turd of a religion on everyone else. I'll vote for anyone who's anti-Muslim.
anon19/05/2019 (Sun) 21:30:536921Reply
this anons response might seem impetuous but this is the objectively correct response to the question.
anon19/05/2019 (Sun) 21:32:046922Reply
You are not fooling anyone we know you are the same guy
anon18/05/2019 (Sat) 16:28:186838Reply
some anon is going to call someone "bhangi" out of frustration IRL accidentally, and get his ass kicked.
4 posts omitted.
anon18/05/2019 (Sat) 18:42:286844Reply
I legit use bhangi as an insult, although people here really don't know its implications.
anon18/05/2019 (Sat) 18:52:286845Reply
As far as I know bhang is Marijuana and bhangi is a guy who smokes it.
anon18/05/2019 (Sat) 18:58:466846Reply
I already call people chamaar with a deadpan face, it's fun being known as the edgy kid so no one takes me seriously.
anon19/05/2019 (Sun) 18:17:276907Reply
My mate used to call people bhangi all the time. Has world become too politically correct in 10 years? I feel the opposite
anon19/05/2019 (Sun) 20:19:456918Reply
I have a half dalit half brahmin friend who we call chamar out of fun. He legit has sensitivities about the topic


(Removes the file reference to the posts)

(Removes the saved files from the server)